Perfectionism: bursting out ideas to color the world
The imperfection of a human makes a human perfect. Human is perfectly
imperfect. I believe the perfection that a human tries to approach determines
one’s color and idea. In perfectionism, there is no right or wrong answer. I
doubt with the existence of ultimate truth, too. However, the approach that a
human makes to what ze thinks is perfect is the attitude, I believe, that we
should have. This does not mean that ze should make no mistake. It means the
one should make best effort to voice and burst out his/her color and ideas,
trying to color the world with his/her existence. This leads me to two
questions: what if the idea that the one bursts is wrong, or will be wrong in
the future; why should the one try hard to make a best effort for the burst.
I feel naïve for
all the possibilities of answers. Thinking about how the ultimate truth (if it
does exist) would criticize the perspective that I hold makes me naïve. For
instance, the concept of civil disobedience can only be determined about the
past. In the moment of that past, the history cannot say anything about that
moment rather it is fighting for the justice or it is a big chaos. The idea how
my answers, my thoughts can be wrong makes me hesitate about voicing my
opinions, since it is the truth I would never know that I want to seek for. Would
we still call the civil movement was a fight for the right thing and justice in
next hundred years? Would we still punish the crime with the same criteria that
we have in the future? Would we still judge the government with the same
general public opinion we have now? I do not know. We could have a totally
antipodal reaction about the same phenomenon in the future. Maybe my ideas
about the social issues can be the subject of mocking criticism in the future. Then,
would it be just wasteful to express my ideas? Well, for this question, I
disagree.
As there are so
much happening in the society and I am exposed to all of such information,
there are so many chances that I can consult myself with a specific point of
view, learning myself how I view the world and specific issues. Now, I am
struggling with the question I have mentioned above, still trying to organize another
answer for that struggle. I did not fully overcome with the doubt for me about
making wrong answers, and still feel naïve. However, I am heading to the point
with the answer that we should still voice out the ideas that we have. I have
asked this same question to my politics teacher, hoping I would get a hint. He
told me that voicing out an idea based on your integrity and your logic is what
we should do. He said it is true that the ideas can be changed and get
criticized, but that is a process that ‘future I’ should do. His point was live
every day, every moment based on your integrity and your logic and do not be
scared if it is wrong, because if you think it is wrong later on, then you just
have to accept your mistake in the past: a natural process that an imperfect
human seeking for truth should go through.
His answer did
not fully answer me. I am still unorganized. But with the second question, ‘why
should the one try hard to make a best effort for the burst,’ I think it is
because these humans’ perfectly imperfect colors determine the next step for
the future. Yes, maybe we are in the state of wrong answers and wrong
stereotypes. But, we should make our best effort to burst our ideas to color
the society, the idea that the one can confidentially assert base on one’s
integrity and logic, to make a better future that has a role to preserve, abandon
or criticize the present.
I TOTALLY agree on Sauhee's hook-ish sentence: "The imperfection of a human makes a human perfect." It is true that humans are imperfect. They are born to be imperfect; perhaps being perfect may be strange thing. The imperfectness of human is the reason why humans are called social animals. We are born to supplement other's shortcomings so that the whole society can be perfect.
ReplyDeleteSome interesting concepts, but honestly I would have trouble identifying which podcast episode or which idea of Gladwell's it is that you are referencing (if you are). So, side tangents are welcome, but try to reference the podcast at least somewhat. As for the idea of perfection, is there any point to it? Nothing is perfect. Nothing is never nothing, either. The post above has me a bit lost in syllogisms and it is best to provide your reader with a bit of precise context. Interesting though.
ReplyDelete